Thursday, May 26, 2016

Daisy turned three years old

Daisy had a birthday this month. She's such a big girl. I'm not FB friends with any of her family - but I do my share of stalking. I see pictures every now and then.

Daisy's birthday will forever be burned in my memory as a horrifically sad day though.
This year, on a day that should have been filled with joy and celebration, Daisy's little sister, Dandelion, was killed.

No one has been arrested.
No one has been jailed.
The story didn't even make the local news.

Daisy and Dandelion had been placed, permanently, with one of Bio Dad's sisters. This aunt just turned and gave the girls back to their parents last year. The parents moved up to Central Texas and continued on about their lives.
I'll never forget the time Mr. CW told me,
"If Daisy goes back home to her mom, she's likely to end up dead."
I remember every nuance of that conversation.
It wasn't Daisy...but it was her sister.

I wasn't going to blog about this until it made the news. I wanted to keep my mouth shut in case we were formally contacted. I found out about the death in a very "off the record" sort of way. I was told that all our information was given to the CPS unit in Central Texas. I was told that they knew we would take Daisy back. And I was also told that it wouldn't happen because we're too far away...I guess sibling visits (with the two surviving siblings that have a different father) would be important.

I grieved hard. Cried for days. Couldn't stop crying. It was so bad!

Then, because I felt like I had to DO something, I contacted a news reporter.

Said news reporter wasn't able to get any documentation. She had asked a co-worker to go to the courthouse to get some paperwork. The co-worker didn't do it and now the reporter is buried in other projects.

Dandelion's death is probably never going to make the news.

I have messaged my original contact a couple different times. It's obvious I'm not going to get any more information from them.

I sent a rather generic email to the CASA unit that would be involved in Daisy's new foster care case. (The county she's in now has a lot of information available online. I don't know the details of the death, but I do know case details that are public.) Granted, I only sent this email yesterday. But I seriously doubt anyone is going to reply.

At this point in time all I want is to make sure that Daisy's new foster family has all her medical records and history. I'd like to tell this new foster family that after they adopt Daisy, they've got legal grounds to sue the State for a certain portion of Daisy's blindness. It's the State's fault she didn't receive the surgery on her right eye. That eye is permanently damaged as a result. I want to let this foster family know that I can send them pictures and videos if they want. I want to know that Daisy is OK.

I also want to make sure that Bio Dad (as I'm assuming he is the one that killed Dandelion) faces true justice this time. That's why I wanted the story in the news. He got off with barely more than a slap on the wrist for nearly killing Daisy. I don't want that to happen again.


It's made things 10x harder with Russell and Star now that I know what happened to Dandelion. There are entirely too many similarities between their case and the Flower Girls' case.

I don't trust CPS at all. They didn't keep Daisy and Dandelion safe. And I don't trust them with Russell and Star, either...especially not after some more things that Bopper told me today.

Foster care sucks.

Thursday, May 5, 2016

what I heard about court

Bopper just sent me a text.

Everything is a she expected today. But nothing changed in the case.

The babies stay with us.

The goal is still to eventually move them to Russell's paternal grandparents' home.

The visit schedule is staying the same. The babies will visit their mother in the CPS office twice a week for three hours each visit. And they will visit their grandparents and Russell's dad on Wednesdays for two hours.

Bopper wanted to move the visits with the grandparents back to my home and set up a separate visit for Dad in the CPS office. I indicated that I'm not willing to open up my home for visits again.

Well...I posed it as a question...telling her first that I wouldn't fight it.

But Bopper immediately said that she'd keep it to just one visit for everyone on the paternal side at the CPS office. And really, that's better for the babies. They don't need ANOTHER visit thrown into the mess each week.

Weekend visits at the grandparents home will start eventually. However, no one knows when. My vote would be July. The next court hearing is August 1. I do NOT think a transition involving overnight visits should last longer than a month. It's hard on kids and even harder on babies. They don't understand and it is so challenging to their schedule. Of vote in this matter doesn't count.

Ms. Remus (the babies' lawyer) asked for permission to travel in June for us. The judge said he needed to see the request. He wouldn't agree to anything yet. So I still don't know if I get to go on vacation or not.

This, along with some other unrelated crappy Foster Care Land news, has got me in a horrible funk today.

Thursday, April 21, 2016

Court is in two weeks

This case goes before a judge in exactly two weeks. I've been told it's a "pre-trial". That means this is supposed to be the end of the case and decisions are supposed to be being made. (See "What court actions can affect me and my child" on this link for a description of the different hearings in Texas.) The trial (final permanency hearing - or court resolution) is scheduled for May 16. This case has already been extended once as Russell has now been in Care for longer than one full year.

Sadly, nothing is being done in this case.


The concurrent goals, as I've seen them most recently, are:
1. non-relative adoption
2. relative conservatorship

I've been told that the primary goal is being changed to "relative conservatorship". I just haven't seen it in writing yet.

At no place in anything is reunification with Bio Mom on the table. And, due to the complexity of this case, no one wants that to be the goal (except Bio Mom and her lawyer, of course).

I believe that CPS is going to ask for another extension.

Bio Mom is still very much with Star's bio dad. That man is the person believed to be the one that broke all of Russell's bones. Mom very much denies being with this man though. She professes over and over that she is single. This is quite contrary to her online presence and the fact that I've personally seen Mom with Star's dad twice in 2016. (He was deported back in September 2015 and hasn't stayed in contact with CPS since that time. He was vocal that he was going to cross back to this side of the wall but since he's been here, everyone is pretending they don't know where he is.)

Russell's grandparents are still being seriously considered for placement of both children. This is more complex now though because Russell's bio dad was released from juvenile detention just this week. Conflicting information has been presented about where he's going to be living. But now that he's out, CPS is going to have to "deal" with him as a parent in the case.

I honestly don't know why they haven't "done" anything yet other than meet with him one time. The found him back in October and nobody did anything about it other than meet with him one time to advise him of the case. To the best of my knowledge, he hasn't even been asked if he wants to work a case plan or be involved in his son's life. (For the first nine months of this case no one was involved on Russell's paternal side at all. The grandparents evaded contact with CPS and lied to everyone about the age and location of their son.)

CPS has been working with Russell's grandparents and the idea that they would take both children (even tho they aren't technically related to Star at all) since January. I personally think the sibling bond should trump everything and these two kids should stay together no matter what. (Think about it - the bond we have with our siblings lasts longer than any other relative bond out there other than possibly cousins. The sibling bond is important!!) CPS is almost 100% sure that Bio Mom won't agree to placing Star with Russell's grandparents though. And because rights aren't being terminated, Mom does have a say in the placement of her children.

So basically everything is a mess. The kids can't go back home to Mom for a huge number of reasons. They can't go to the grandparents right now because of the presence of Bio Dad in the home and several other concerns that haven't been addressed yet. There is also concern of keeping the siblings together and the fact that Mom probably won't allow Star to go to the grandparents. But rather than do anything, CPS is doing nothing.

The DA for the State continues to tell Bopper that it is a very weak case. The DA says there are no grounds to terminate rights on anyone.

I simply do not understand that line of thinking at all!!
  1. Bio Mom is the one that medically neglected Russell to the point of near death. At 18 months of age he weighed less than 10 pounds. She didn't follow up with any of his specialists and didn't consistently get him the medical care that he needed. This is documented by CPS and Mom has the finding "reason to believe" for severe medical neglect on her record. So even though no one can prove who broke Russell's bones, they do know who starved him. It's documented and I've met people at the hospital that would be willing to testify to Russell's condition and how Mom treated him when he was being cared for at the hospital January 2015.
  2. Star's bio dad has abandoned her. He has never met her. He stopped communicating with CPS when he was deported in September 2015. At some point in time CPS could move forward with severing his rights based on abandonment.
  3. Russell's bio dad just turned 19 years old today. He has another son by another woman. He is in a gang. I'm not sure he has ever met Russell. I am quite confident he's not in a position to raise a son with special needs along with a little girl he's not related to at all. (Again, I think the siblings should stay together no matter what.) Someone just needs to sit down with this man and ask him if he would like to relinquish his rights. Worst case, offer him a service plan and see if he's able to follow through. Does he want to take a parenting class? Does he want to learn about Down syndrome and what it takes to raise a child with Ds? It's not unreasonable to ask these things of him if he wants to be involved.
I don't think TPR should be entered into lightly. I think all parents should be given a chance at redemption. But this case involves EXTREME abuse and no one seems to be addressing that at CPS. I did my research. According to the State standards, the grounds for TPR have been met. I simply do not understand why the DA insists on saying this is such a weak case.

I've been a mess every since Bopper left this morning. Even though I didn't expect to learn anything new, hearing her say they're just asking for an extension on the case because they don't like any other option available bothers me tremendously. I feel like I've been sucker punched. I'm feeling anxiety in a very physical way today. There is a heaviness on me and I'm having a hell of a time focusing on anything.

There's something about the year mark in a foster care case that changes me. I guess I feel like progress should be being made somewhere by a year. I totally understand that cases take a long time. I expect them to. I believe that every effort should be made to reunify with bio family before other options are considered. But when progress isn't being made...CPS should be DOING something.

I think they need to get concrete reasons why the DA says this is a weak case. Then they need to fix those problems. They can prove that Mom starved Russell. They can prove that she didn't get him any medical attention for 14 of his 15 fractures. This should mean something. Interview doctors and other staff at the hospital. Locate the ECI (Early Childhood Intervention) therapists that worked in the home with Mom periodically for the first 18 months of Russell's life. Do something.

They need to be doing something to prove that Mom is continually lying about her relationship with Star's dad. She's lying about where she's living. She's lying about so many things that can be proved with little to no effort. Don't tell me that they just have to take Mom at her word. Do something.

Start the official paperwork to "locate" Star's dad. If he's going to abandon his daughter, do something about it.

If the children are going to ultimately end up with the grandparents anyway, do something to help this transition. They've been missing visits lately. Their behavior at visits is questionable. Do something about this. Either work to get the kids there safely, or start working on an alternate placement.

And yes, the only other alternate placement that CPS can identify is our home. So start the TPR process or start talking to people about giving us PMC if they absolutely positively cannot terminate rights.

But this sticking your head in the sand and just asking for an extension is pissing me off. Do something already!

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Osteogenesis Imperfecta

When Russell came in to foster care (February 2015), he was healing from fifteen fractures: 2 in the skull, 3 in the ribs, and both arms and both legs in multiple places. All of the fractures were at different stages of healing. The most recent one was his left arm. That one required casting for a couple weeks. (He also had a lacerated liver and at 18 months of age weighed less than 10 pounds.)

At some point in time during the initial investigation, someone mentioned something to someone about needing to get the testing done for Osteogenesis Imperfecta (brittle bone disease). No one did this though. Russell was released from the hospital and sent to a shelter in Central Texas. And no one told me to order the test done when he joined our family.

Then Russell broke his leg while under my watch. (January 2016)

Bopper scrambled to get information. She wasn't the case worker when Russell came in to Care. She didn't know if the OI test had been done or not. After digging through records, it was determined that the OI test had not been done. I was told to get one scheduled.

I had our family doctor get a referral to a geneticist the day after we were released from the hospital. The soonest available appointment was for today (March 30, 2016). I loaded up the babies this morning and set off for the geneticist. Thankfully Russell was the first patient on the list to see the doctor. Our wait was minimal (the doctor came in about 30 minutes past our appointment time).

The doctor walked in to the exam room and basically started off the show by saying the OI test is very expensive (around $2500) and the only lab in Texas that does it does not take Medicaid. He then spent a lot of time explaining how the insurance system works and how the Baylor College of Medicine would do the test but they would require a credit card up front. Basically, if CPS wants the test done, they can foot the bill for it.

The doctor performed a visual exam of Russell. He measured things. He examined all his limbs looking for deformities. He looked at his teeth and eyes. When finished, the doctor indicated that Russell doesn't have any of the markers for even mild Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Now, I don't think this will hold up well in a court of law. But I'm not sure the results of this test matter in court anyway. No one is trying to press charges for the broken bones. No one was charged criminally at all. They claim they don't have enough evidence. And as the case stands right now, Mom is in no position at all to be reunified with her children. So this test would be a formality. The results of it won't change the outcome of the case at all.

Still, none of this is up to me. All I can do is inform the decision makers of what happened today and let them sort it out. I called Bopper as soon as I got in the car. She didn't pick up so I left her a message to call me. Then I called Ms. Lawson, Russell's lawyer. Ms. Lawson didn't pick up either. So I made one more call to her office. I was able to speak with a receptionist. I left a message with the receptionist explaining the situation as briefly as possible.

Ms. Lawson sent me a text letting me know she was in court.

She must have felt the situation was important though. Not too long after I hung up with her receptionist, I got a call back. Ms. Lawson had some more questions.

So back and forth we went for a bit. Her receptionist would ask me a question. She'd relay my answer to Ms. Lawson. Ms. Lawson would ask another question, the receptionist would call me. It was a bit cumbersome. But Ms. Lawson determined that she would be requesting a special hearing to let the judge know about the inability to do the OI testing right now.

Then Bopper returned my call.

Before we could deal with the drama of the OI test - we first had to deal with the drama of the grandparent visit that didn't happen today. I had spoken with Bopper last week to tell her that the appointment at the geneticist at 9:00am was going to make a 10:00am visit impossible today. Bopper agreed with me that the doctor appointment could count as a "visit" and that she would let the grandparents know.

Unfortunately, Bopper forgot to tell the grandparents anything last week.

So while I was out today, Herman got to deal with the visit supervisor that showed up and then the grandparents that arrived a few minutes later. Thankfully I had warned Herman this might happen so he was prepared.

Bopper handled all that. Then she called me back so we could discuss the OI test that didn't happen.

There wasn't much for Bopper to say or do. She thanked me for letting Ms. Lawson know already and she told me that she would tell her supervisor immediately. (She also mentioned that the staffing that was supposed to happen yesterday didn't but she was scheduled to sit down with her supervisor this afternoon to staff the case.)

That's all I know. The geneticist didn't schedule another appointment. No tests were run today. Decision makers have to decide how to proceed. Lord willing they will do so intelligently. Personally, I don't think this expensive test needs to be run. The System is strapped for cash, this results of this test aren't going to change the placement outcome, so it doesn't seem necessary. At least not to me. But I'm not a decision maker in this case.

Once home, I sent an email to Ms. Lawson giving her some of the information I had relayed via the receptionist in writing. I wanted to make sure the information had been relayed accurately. I also reiterated that the geneticist doesn't think Russell has any of the markers of OI. I copied a list I found on the internet to show her what the signs are:

  • bone deformities
  • multiple broken bones
  • loose joints
  • weak teeth
  • blue sclera, or a bluish color in the white of the eye
  • bowed legs and arms
  • kyphosis, or an abnormal outward curve of the upper spine
  • scoliosis, or an abnormal lateral curve of the spine
  • early hearing loss
  • respiratory problems
  • heart defects
I mentioned again that Russell is normal for a child with Down syndrome.

Russell's visit with his grandparents is likely to be rescheduled for Monday morning next week. I guess I'll hear what the decision makers decide to do later. I'll keep on doing what foster parents do best...wait to hear what to do next.

Monday, March 28, 2016

praying for Bopper

Bopper is a young thing. I know she's not fresh out of school – she has been with CPS for several years now. But she's still quite young. (Thus the blog name "Bopper" in Teeny Bopper.)

Bopper is also VERY VERY VERY soft spoken. She admits to being scared of everyone and everything. Even she finds it ironic that she's in this line of work. She's sweet and quiet and reminds me of a church mouse.

I need Bopper to be the exact opposite of that tomorrow.

You see, Bopper has a meeting with her supervisor tomorrow to "staff this case". That means her supervisor takes time to have a sit-down meeting with Bopper to go over important details concerning these kids. She is to give him details and they work together to decide what should happen next.

I'd like to think that he always has his hands on this case. I'd like to think that the supervisor knows what's going on. But that's not realistic. So these "staffings" are held and that's where Bopper catches him up.

And tomorrow, Bopper has to go over the most recent visits and things that have happened with Russell's grandparents. She has to bring valid concerns to her supervisor's attention. She needs to be able to speak strongly and she needs to convey a real opinion about what she thinks should happen and how this case should move forward.

I'm praying that Bopper grows a set and is more opinionated and stronger tomorrow than I've ever seen her before.

You see, some things happened last Wednesday with the grandparents when they were in my home for their visit with the babies that concerned me. On the surface they might seem minor. But if you look at them seriously and factor in that Russell has severe special needs - and will have severe special needs for the rest of his life - the situation isn't really minor at all. Not only did they concern me, but they concerned the visit supervisor as well. I know the monitor took notes and reported everything. I called Bopper to talk to her about them myself. I told Bopper what happened and strongly suggested that she get a copy of the visit notes soon.

And yes, I'm being vague. I'm not going to open my blog up as a place to bash on the family of origin. Because if everything is determined by the State that Russell and Star be placed with the grandparents, I'm going to comply and I will continue to work with the grandparents as much as I can to make the transition a healthy one for everyone involved. The children were safe in my home. But based on what happened, there are new concerns about the long-term viability of the babies being placed with the grandparents.

I've been praying all weekend for Bopper and I'm going to focus my prayers on her as this case moves forward. She always tells me what happens in these staffings. I can tell that her supervisor is rather cut and dry and he wants Bopper to be more that way herself. I know that Bopper doesn't want these children placed with the grandparents for many reasons (ones that were presented in the home study that they failed plus the new concerns that have been brought to light). What I don't want to have happen is for Bopper to present her concerns to her supervisor in a wishy-washy way. I want her to be direct and concise. From there, I hope that CPS can develop a plan that is viable that will keep Russell and Star safe.

If this plan is for the children to be placed with the grandparents, I want them to develop a timeline and make it happen. If the plan is to abandon the idea of placement with the grandparents, I want them to come up with a viable alternative.

What I don't want to have happen is for CPS to simply drag this case out as long as possible. And sadly, Bopper has told me specifically that that is what she wants to do for now. I realize that Bopper thinks dragging the case out keeps Russell safe in our home. But it's not healthy for cases to get drug out for a long time. Either the grandparents are an option for permanent placement or they aren't. I don't do well living in limbo forever. I'm here for the babies as long as they need me. But I don't believe that long-term foster care is good for anyone if there isn't progress being made in the case. I believe that my family deserves some finality too. Again, I have no problem being a resource and having the children in my home when progress is being made. But right now, people need to determine if the grandparents are an option or not. Don't just keep the kids in foster care because you don't want to deal with any other solution.

Bopper says her meeting with her supervisor is tomorrow (if he doesn't reschedule it). I'm praying for Bopper. Will you join me in that prayer? And yes, as soon as I hear anything, I'll let y'all know what is decided. We don't go to court again until May, but a million things could happen between now and then. This is foster care after all. And foster care sucks.

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Visit in my home #2

I got a text from Bopper this morning at about 8:30am. It's Spring Break in Texas and the grandparents wanted to know if it would be OK if they brought all five of their kids to today's visit. I took a deep breath and responded yes. It's only two hours. I really didn't think it would be that big of a deal.

However, as I thought about this, it bothered me to know that legally this family could not travel to my home all together. They have only one vehicle and it seats only five people. Four of their children are required by Texas law to be in a car seat or booster. The car seats are to be installed per manufacturer's instructions. And I'm pretty sure no manufacturers say kids can be in the front seat. So, technically, four of their kids need to be in the back seat. They don't have a vehicle where this is possible. I have briefly expressed this concern to CPS before - but only how it would affect unsupervised weekend visits with the babies as I assumed those were going to be starting very soon and I wanted to know how I would be required to handle that if I were doing a drop off by myself.
Side note: Typically we meet in the parking lot at the CPS office in the evening, after the office is closed, to drop-off kids. At least that's how it worked with Daisy. I wanted to know what my reaction should be if the grandparents didn't have proper car seats for the babies AND what I should do if they didn't have proper car seats for their own kids. Bopper's initial reaction was that I would only be responsible for things if they didn't have car seats for Russell and Star. She said that the grandparents are looking for a new vehicle. And then she said that unsupervised visits aren't going to be happening for a long, long time.
Anyway...I decided that if I didn't say something to CPS about my transportation concerns again, it would eat at me too much. I was VERY CLEAR that I didn't expect anything to change today! I still expected that both grandparents would come along with all five children. However, I felt it was necessary to at least point out to CPS if were to happen, it wouldn't happen legally.

I'm not sure what Bopper said. But the grandparents decided that Grandma would come with only three children and Grandpa would stay at home with the other two.
The visit went well enough. I'm not going to complain. This is unique ground we're covering. While co-parenting might be the norm in other parts of the country, I've been told by every single person involved here (my agency, CPS, and the visit supervising company) that having visits in the home of the foster parents is completely unheard of.

Grandma and her three oldest kids came to the visit. They played in the living room with the babies for a little over an hour. Then Grandma asked about feeding Russell lunch.

Both babies were brought into the kitchen. I got lunch ready and then stepped back a bit so Grandma could feed Russell (and Star could feed herself – Star refuses to eat off a spoon but will feed herself anything you put on her tray). I couldn't leave though, as I was baking cookies.

The visit supervisor did a great job of translating back and forth between Grandma and I. Russell was being a bit of a stinker and didn't want to cooperate with Grandma as she was feeding him. Star seemed uncomfortable too. It was more just because it's awkward and different though. Grandma certainly wasn't doing anything wrong!!!! I tried to explain to Grandma that his behavior wasn't normal at all, though. And then I explained that she'd likely see more behavior like that if/when he moved to her home and that she should expect a lot of regression. She asked why.
I explained that Russell doesn't understand what's going on around him. There will be no way to explain to him why he's moving in with them. I've been taught in several different trauma trainings that a move can cause a kid to regress as much as a year. That's why kids in foster care need additional supports to heal. And even though Russell is safe in our home, a move is still a move. That's one reason why I wanted visits to be in my home. The kids will see me interacting with the grandparents. They will see me trusting them. And it will be easier for the bond I have with the kids to transfer to the grandparents. Grandma expressed gratitude again for all we're doing for the babies.

As for Russell's behaviors though, I went on to explain why I'm so incredibly strict. For example, when it comes time to wash his face, I won't let him turn his head away from me. I firmly grasp his head and tell him no if he doesn't cooperate. I don't play with him or make it seem like what he's doing is OK.

It's not that his behavior isn't normal for a 2 year old. It is! But his maturity is going to happen so incredibly slow, that if you don't start NOW to direct appropriate behavior, you'll be dealing with an 5 or 6 year old that won't wash his face or let you do it.

I hate feeling like I have to present the worst case scenarios. Of course not all kids with Ds are going to be that delayed. But kids with Ds are very known for having behavioral difficulties. Anyone that parents Russell will be doing themselves a favor by being incredibly consistent and firm in establishing proper rules and expectations.

It's hard to convey all that I know about Down syndrome in these short meetings via a translator. I certainly don't try to be negative all the time either. But I want the grandparents to understand what to expect. I get the impression they haven't starting trying to learn anything about Down syndrome on their own. That makes me a little sad. But, it's apparent that they love Russell so I cling to that.

I explained as much as I could about Russell, what's normal for him, and what to expect as he gets older. It seems harsh in a way. But if they're not going to try and learn anything on their own, they need to hear from someone that it's possible that Russell won't ever be developmentally/emotionally older than 8 or 9 years old.

I was thankful this visit supervisor cut things off at noon, exactly. (Last week lunch drug on longer that it should because Grandma doesn't keep things moving with Russell and he doesn't want to eat for her well. The visit went on until almost 12:30 and the supervisor let it. I was too uncomfortable to tell everyone to leave. LOL)

After everyone was gone I called My Genius Sister to get a little bit of what I call "therapy". She lets me process all my feelings and lets me vent so the things that bother me don't eat me up. There were a few things about this visit that bothered me significantly. But I spewed everything to my sister and I'll suck it up and go on from there. If I get a chance, I will convey my concerns to Bopper. But I don't think it's anything Bopper doesn't already know so I'm not too concerned.

My big kids should be back from the trampoline park and lunch soon. I sent them off so they wouldn't have to be here during the visit. The rest of the afternoon is just for us. I like days like that. And because the visit was in my home this morning, the transition to nap was very smooth. As awkward as these visits are, they are still best for the babies. I'm glad we're able to do things this way.

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Baby Jail

I will start out by first admitting that we have been blessed with a huge house! We've got five bedrooms and 3200 square feet. There is a lot of open space downstairs and we've got a huge playroom upstairs. We are lucky!! Very lucky!

Baby Jail 1, on the left in the photo above, is tucked in the corner of our living room. It's up against a pony wall. On the other side of the wall is Baby Jail 2. It's next to my "office" area where I do my freelancing.

The baby jails are large. We certainly don't "need" two of them. But Miss Star is determined to get into trouble almost 24/7. She loves to leave the living room and try to go up the stairs or mess with things she's not supposed to (things like electrical cords and fun stuff like that). That's why I ended up moving Baby Jail 1 into the living room. Sometimes in the evening I just want to relax. And I didn't like having the babies in the jail away from us while we watched TV and whatnot. Due to our schedules, I freelance mainly when the babies are asleep now, so it made sense to move jail into the living room.

I decided to buy Baby Jail 2 for a couple reasons. One reason is because we have the room and I knew it would be nice to have a jail next to my office and one in the living room. The biggest reason I bought jail #2 though is that Russell is rough with Star – very rough! He doesn't mean to be. And it's nothing I can really discipline. But he bites her. And he hits her. And he tackles her and makes her fall down. I have to answer for every single injury and I simply can't take chances. There are times when I can't watch the children 100% of the time. Russell bites out of nowhere...even when I am watching. So I worry even more if I'm not in the room directly with them. Plus, I still need to do things like laundry, fix dinner, or even just take a shower. Having a baby-proofed separate space for each kid was necessary. Star no longer enjoys being in a bouncer. She wants to move around. Baby Jail made the most sense.

Baby Jail 1 - in the living room
Baby Jail 2 - on the office side

How I Organize the Toys

Developmentally, Russell is still very much an infant. He doesn't pretend anything. He doesn't even push cars around. When Russell plays, he takes toys out of containers and puts toys back in containers. He shakes and bangs things together. And he throws. He chews on everything.

Russell needs infant toys. (Star does too. But she's developing normally. I'm going to focus on Russell's needs as I describe how I organize the toys. Of course, everything applies to Star as well.) I have musical instruments, blocks, cars and other vehicles to push, shape sorters, and ball drops. He also has a huge selection of rattles and chew toys.

Russell gets bored rather quickly. He can't help it. There's only so much to figure out when all he does is dump toys out and shake them a few times. It doesn't make sense for me to buy him "bigger kid" toys though. He doesn't know what to do with them. When Russell gets bored, he throws even more. He also starts "stimming" by rocking back and forth and humming loudly. One solution to his boredom is to offer him a new selection of toys regularly. I try to switch up his toys where he's playing 1-2 times a day (depending on how long he's playing in jail...he certainly doesn't stay in jail all day). In order to make this process easier, I bought some baskets.

Each basket has a different assortment of toys inside. There are things to push, things to bang that make noise, and things to chew on. Having the open baskets that stack make it super easy to swap toys out. I simply grab everything in the jail and put it in the basket. Then I put a new basket in jail for the child. All the baskets live outside Baby Jail 2. (Again, we've been blessed with a lot of room. I know that and appreciate that!)

Rotating toys is such a wonderful thing to do for any age kid! In fact, I miss having a basement. When TT and Bart were younger, I swapped the toys out in our playroom a couple different times a year. When we moved here though, that wasn't possible as I don't have storage room and all the toys fit in our playroom. Doing it on a smaller level like this with the infant toys has been wonderful though! It keeps the babies entertained longer and that makes everyone happier.

The only thing to note is a skill that Russell learned just last night. Apparently it is no longer safe to leave the large basket in jail with Russell. He figured out how to turn it upside down and was almost able to completely break out of jail in a matter of minutes. Russell is no dummy! So as much as he plays with the baskets by putting toys in and taking them out, he doesn't get to do that part anymore unless I'm directly in the room with him.